A real joy, too, in seeing what comes out of the box next. There is a joy in seeing tape players get smaller, and the introduction of an iPhone and a big CRT computer screen. The first room is a child's bedroom, from around 1997, the second a first apartment or - my instinct - a student digs in the noughties. The game part is fitting in all the stuff you have in a way that makes sense. Once you've emptied a box it flatpacks itself out of existence. What you do is open moving boxes and take things out of them, and place them around the room. I and many others have been quietly cooing over the idea of Unpacking for a while, and this weekend a demo of the first two unpackenings came out, coinciding with PAX X EGX this week. Packing is hell, but Unpacking sort makes me want to move house so I can unpack. Unpacking does a very accurate representation of this, whilst also being a very satisfying and sweet game of Tetris-with-stuff. When you start unpacking these boxes, you get to enjoy being suddenly ambushed by a load of pants or a scented candle lurking in a box of plugs and batteries. At this point you shove everything into wherever it will fit and have a lot of boxes that say 'GENERAL' or 'STUFF'. The second stage is the panic stage, which is done anywhere from about a week from your moving date up to the second you hand your keys back. The majority of your clothes go into a suitcase. ![]() You put most of your books and DVDs in smaller boxes because they are very heavy. ![]() You slowly wrap up all but one of each piece of crockery in old wrapping paper and copies of The Metro, and put them in a box with KITCHEN written on the side. The first stage happens when you have loads of time before you have to leave, and is when you box things up in a way that makes sense. In addition, the decision may have significant implications regarding EPA’s flexibility in mandating state plans to reduce carbon emissions under sections 111(d) and 115 of the Clean Air Act.There are two stages of packing for a move, as everyone knows. ![]() It will shape further development of EPA’s ongoing efforts to deal with interstate pollution, but it also has broader implications for the role of cost under federal pollution laws. Although the specific question before the Court is now settled, the Court’s holding has continuing ramifications. Indeed, neither the majority opinion nor the dissent seems to have fully grasped how allocation would work even in some of the simplified numerical examples discussed by the justices. Although the specific statutory provision at issue was deceptively simple, the underlying problem was especially complex because of the large number of states involved. EME Homer City Generator, L.P., gives EPA broad discretion to craft regulatory solutions for this problem. Justice Ginsburg’s opinion for the Court in EPA v. ![]() Allocating responsibility for emissions cuts when multiple upwind states contribute to downwind air quality violations presents a particularly difficult problem. Interstate air pollution can prevent even the most diligent downwind state from attaining the air quality levels required by federal law.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |